The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was a multilateral trade agreement that was created in 1947 with the aim of promoting free trade and reducing barriers to international commerce. GATT was in effect from 1948 until 1995, when it was replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which now governs international trade.
History of GATT
The idea for GATT was first proposed during the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944, which established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. At the time, the world was still recovering from the economic devastation of World War II, and there was a growing sense that international cooperation was needed to rebuild the global economy.
GATT was created as a temporary measure to promote free trade among its member countries. The original agreement consisted of 23 countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Canada. Over time, the number of member countries grew to 128 by the time GATT was replaced by the WTO in 1995.
Principles of GATT
GATT was founded on several principles designed to promote free trade and reduce barriers to international commerce. These principles included:
- Non-discrimination: GATT’s most important principle was the principle of non-discrimination, which held that member countries should not discriminate between trading partners. Specifically, GATT required that each member country treat all other member countries equally, and not discriminate against any particular country or group of countries.
- Reduction of trade barriers: Another key principle of GATT was the reduction of trade barriers, including tariffs, quotas, and other barriers to trade. GATT members were required to reduce these barriers and work towards the eventual elimination of all trade restrictions.
- Promotion of trade: GATT also aimed to promote trade among member countries by encouraging the growth of international commerce and reducing barriers to trade.
- Transparency: GATT required member countries to be transparent about their trade policies and practices, and to provide information about their trade regulations and practices to other member countries.
- Dispute resolution: GATT also established a dispute resolution mechanism to resolve trade disputes between member countries.
Impact of GATT
GATT had a significant impact on international trade, promoting the growth of global commerce and reducing trade barriers around the world. Some of the key impacts of GATT included:
- Reduced trade barriers: GATT was successful in reducing trade barriers, including tariffs and other restrictions on trade. This helped to increase the flow of goods and services between countries, and contributed to economic growth and development around the world.
- Increased trade: GATT’s focus on promoting trade among member countries helped to increase the volume of international commerce, and contributed to the growth of the global economy.
- Economic growth: GATT played an important role in promoting economic growth and development around the world, by reducing trade barriers and increasing trade among member countries.
- Improved standards of living: GATT’s promotion of free trade and economic growth helped to improve standards of living around the world, by creating new jobs, increasing access to goods and services, and raising incomes.
- Dispute resolution: GATT’s dispute resolution mechanism helped to resolve trade disputes between member countries, reducing the risk of trade wars and other forms of economic conflict.
Challenges and Criticisms of GATT
Despite its many successes, GATT faced a number of challenges and criticisms during its time in effect. Some of the key challenges and criticisms included:
- Slow progress: Despite its focus on reducing trade barriers, progress was often slow and incremental under GATT. Some countries were resistant to reducing trade barriers, and negotiations could be slow and difficult.
- Inequality: Critics argued that GATT favored developed countries over developing countries, and that the benefits of free trade were not equally distributed. Some argued that developed countries had an unfair advantage in negotiations, and that developing countries were often left behind.
- Environmental concerns: GATT did not address environmental concerns, leading to criticism that the agreement prioritized economic growth over environmental protection. Some argued that GATT contributed to unsustainable development practices and environmental degradation.
- Labor concerns: GATT did not address labor concerns, leading to criticism that the agreement prioritized economic growth over labor rights and protections. Some argued that GATT contributed to exploitation of workers in developing countries.
- Lack of enforcement: GATT’s dispute resolution mechanism was often criticized for being slow and ineffective, and there were few consequences for countries that violated the agreement. Some argued that GATT needed stronger enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance.
GATT and the Creation of the WTO
Despite these challenges, GATT remained in effect for nearly 50 years and played a significant role in promoting free trade and reducing trade barriers around the world. However, by the 1990s, it became clear that GATT needed to be updated and strengthened to better reflect the changing global economy.
In 1995, GATT was replaced by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which built on the principles and achievements of GATT, but also addressed some of the criticisms and challenges that had been leveled at the previous agreement. The WTO includes a stronger dispute resolution mechanism, and has expanded its focus to include new areas of trade, such as intellectual property and services.